Chemo will Kill you

What the 'professionals' won't tell you...

As you can see from a few of the blog posts, radiation from mammograms is outrageously excessive and has all the ingredients to actually cause the cancers it is trying to detect. Every time we have a mammogram we get the equivalent of 1000 Chest X-Rays. When I was a young woman regular Chest x-Rays were advised and many people were worried about their  side effects, I note that those Chest X-Rays are no longer on the scene, surely because of these concerns. Yet we are now asked to undergo routine Mammograms that are vastly more dangerous-Are we going backwards? or is it that women are expendable in the quest for greater profits and moral issues often take a backseat to money issues. I won't be having another Mammogram ever, How do others feel? 

Views: 26

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This is fantastic info Nut Lady. Yes it does seem like we are going backwards, it really is crazy.
I won't ever be having a mammogram that's for sure. I'm wondering how much radiation is in an ultrasound as an alternative.
Apart from the radiation these things give off they are supposed to be an early detection tool, however, most cancers of the breast are there for up to 10 years before these scans can detect them...how is that 'early detection'?
A friend of my wife and I had a mammogram 5 months ago and was given the 'all clear' 4 months later a tumor approx 4 cms was felt by her in her breast. Now either the tumor was missed by the mammogram or the mammogram failed to pick it up. Of course there is the probability that the cells had already changed but had yet to form the tumor but this also indicates how useless these scans are!
Infact, mammograms do nothing but get women to the clinic and start the preparation for their induction into the cancer industries mass income machines and treatments.
As the original thread has already stated if you don't have breast cancer now, having yearly mammograms will in time start it off for you. Infact in America the Govt has changed the regulations and made it so the scans are to be every second year instead of yearly to try to save women from the overdoses of radiation, of course the only ones to objest was the AMA, Cancer Councils and Big Pharma who stand to lose millions of dollars of income from this decision.
Remmeber
The Choice Is Always Yours
Good on you Mike we need a few good men to understand how devastating these diagnoses can be and how powerless women feel in the face of all the intimidation that they have to withstand.

Mike G said:
Apart from the radiation these things give off they are supposed to be an early detection tool, however, most cancers of the breast are there for up to 10 years before these scans can detect them...how is that 'early detection'?
A friend of my wife and I had a mammogram 5 months ago and was given the 'all clear' 4 months later a tumor approx 4 cms was felt by her in her breast. Now either the tumor was missed by the mammogram or the mammogram failed to pick it up. Of course there is the probability that the cells had already changed but had yet to form the tumor but this also indicates how useless these scans are!
Infact, mammograms do nothing but get women to the clinic and start the preparation for their induction into the cancer industries mass income machines and treatments.
As the original thread has already stated if you don't have breast cancer now, having yearly mammograms will in time start it off for you. Infact in America the Govt has changed the regulations and made it so the scans are to be every second year instead of yearly to try to save women from the overdoses of radiation, of course the only ones to object was the AMA, Cancer Councils and Big Pharma who stand to lose millions of dollars of income from this decision.
Remember
The Choice Is Always Yours

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Latest Activity

ednshell left a comment for ednshell
"I am sorry to see it go but I understand, that is a lot of money they are asking!  Thank you so much for making this site, it truly has been a gem!!!  I am sure many people besides me got invaluable information and inspiration coming…"
Sep 24, 2016
The Nut Lady left a comment for ednshell
"Sorry but the cost of keeping this site going just got crazy, $588 annually, unfortunately I can't continue that so Ning will terminate the site on Oct 1st. Thanks for all your help and good luck, keep up the good fight."
Sep 23, 2016
The Nut Lady left a comment for ednshell
"It appears Ning are going to pull the plug on this site Ednshell"
Sep 23, 2016
ednshell left a comment for Martin S Levine
"Welcome Martin! What are doing to heal your body?"
Sep 22, 2016
Martin S Levine is now a member of Chemo will Kill you
Sep 22, 2016
Paul Maasson is now a member of Chemo will Kill you
Jun 12, 2016
FRANK KWABENA is now a member of Chemo will Kill you
Feb 24, 2016
RawVeganGamer replied to The Nut Lady's discussion Healing cancer from the inside out
"At 1:19 there is a bunch of peer reviewed sources, its hard to read them all here is 18. Impact of efforts to increase participation in repetitive screenings for early breast cancer detection. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1530069/"
Sep 20, 2015
RawVeganGamer commented on ednshell's photo
Thumbnail

next

"You might think ok what about medical school, doctors have high debts so they need high salaries. Yet, considering doctor's pay, medical school isn't all that expensive. "Specifically the 2012 the median debt at graduation was…"
Sep 3, 2015
RawVeganGamer commented on ednshell's photo
Thumbnail

next

"I really love this photo, thanks for sharing ednshell. Here's a chart of doctor's salaries: http://www1.salary.com/Doctor-Salary.html As you can see many doctors make around $200,000 a year. With the lowest Psychologist, still making…"
Sep 3, 2015
RawVeganGamer posted a discussion

Scholarly peer reviewed statics on untreated patients

Patients with no treatment for cancer have a surprisingly high survival rate. Personally, after seeing and hearing what chemotherapy does to people, even if I'm not completely sold on the idea of diet, no treatment is a viable option.   From the below links, you can see that the 10 year survival rate is low, but when you take into account "The 10-year, disease-specific survival rate was 86.8%" JAMA. 1992 Apr…See More
Sep 3, 2015
RawVeganGamer replied to The Nut Lady's discussion Healing cancer from the inside out
"Found another example of how chemotherapy is less effective than a placebo. As you can see the untreated patients have a 2% lower chance of survival for the first two years. An uninformed person might be like great, treatment for the win. Hold, on…"
Sep 2, 2015
Susan Gonzalez updated their profile
Aug 24, 2015
Profile IconSusan Gonzalez and RawVeganGamer joined Chemo will Kill you
Aug 24, 2015
RawVeganGamer posted a discussion

Yo, from Philly area

Yo, thought I would introduce myself. I'm healthy, yet I've lost at least one family member to cancer. Also a close friend of the family. I'm here for revenge, I want revenge on the cancer industry. The best way for me to get revenge is to share the truth.   Also, posting about this topic helps me come to the realization that this is true, I guess I still had some doubts. Its helping me deal with my strong feelings. Thanks for listening.See More
Aug 24, 2015
RawVeganGamer replied to The Nut Lady's discussion Healing cancer from the inside out
"Hey, I'm starting a little project where I'm gathering peer reviewed articles about chemo. From watching the below video I managed to extract this peer reviewed article found at 52 seconds in. I plan to find…"
Aug 24, 2015

© 2017   Created by The Nut Lady.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service